Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Tax Controversy Watch

Focusing on Significant Developments in the Tax Controversy World

Tax Controversy Watch

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Category Archives: Intergovernmental Agreement

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ISSUES STERN WARNING TO NON-COMPLIANT TAXPAYERS WITH OFFSHORE HOLDINGS

Posted on October 16, 2015 by Matthew D. Lee
1

Just one day after the October 15 deadline for filing personal income tax returns on extension, the Internal Revenue Service issued a strongly-worded warning to non-compliant taxpayers: take action now to fix your problem, or face serious consequences. At the same time, the IRS revealed, for the first time, that nearly 85,000 taxpayers have taken advantage of voluntary disclosure programs for unreported offshore assets over the course of the last seven years. The IRS also disclosed that it has conducted “thousands” of offshore-related civil audits of taxpayers, resulting in the payment of “tens of millions of dollars” to the U.S. Treasury.

In a press release dated October 16, 2015, and entitled “Offshore Compliance Programs Generate $8 Billion; IRS Urges People to Take Advantage of Voluntary Disclosure Programs,” IRS Commissioner John Koskinen touted global cooperation among nations to automatically exchange tax information as providing tax authorities around the world, including the Internal Revenue Service, with substantial greater leverage to combat tax evasion:

“The groundbreaking effort around automatic reporting of foreign accounts has given us a much stronger hand in fighting tax evasion. People with undisclosed foreign accounts should carefully consider their options and use available avenues, including the offshore program and streamlined procedures, to come back into full compliance with their tax obligations.”

The IRS announced updated statistics regarding participation in its offshore voluntary disclosure programs, which have existed since 2009. More than 54,000 taxpayers have utilized the formal IRS amnesty program, called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), paying more than $8 billion in taxes, penalties, and interest to the U.S. Treasury. In addition, the newer Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures (initiated in 2012 but not fully clarified and expanded until June 2014) have been exceedingly popular with non-compliant taxpayers. The streamlined program, which is designed for “non-willful” taxpayers, has seen more than 30,000 applicants, with two-thirds of those submissions made since June 2014 when the streamlined eligibility criteria were expanded.

These statistics demonstrate overwhelming interest in the streamlined procedures, while applications for the formal OVDP appear to be waning. Prior to announcement of the streamlined procedures, the IRS received withering criticism for the OVDP’s “one-size-fits-all” penalty structure that contained no mechanism to distinguish between individuals who had engaged in outright tax evasion and those taxpayers whose non-compliance was due to “non-willful” conduct, such as a good faith misunderstanding of the law. The streamlined program was designed to provide an alternative to the perceived harsh treatment accorded OVDP participants, and judging by the statistics announced today, it appears that the vast majority of taxpayers who have taken action in the past year have rejected the OVDP option and instead elected for streamlined treatment. Curiously absent from today’s IRS announcement is any discussion of the number of taxpayers whose streamlined applications were rejected. The streamlined program application ominously warns that taxpayers whose conduct is not genuinely “non-willful” risk being rejected from the streamlined program and subject to audit or criminal investigation. The IRS is undoubtedly scrutinizing streamlined applications in an effort to ensure that “willful” taxpayers are not able to “sneak” through the less rigorous program alternative. The IRS also has not provided any statistics regarding the number of taxpayers who have utilized the disfavored (in the eyes of the IRS) “quiet disclosure” path, although tracking such taxpayers is admittedly difficult given the nature of such disclosures.

Today’s announcement by the IRS makes clear the risk to non-compliant taxpayer because of global developments regarding the automatic exchange of tax exchange now in effect. Both the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), which is now fully effective, and the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard, which starts to become effective in 2016, are mechanisms to provide tax authorities throughout the world (including the U.S.) with information about taxpayers with offshore assets:

Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and the network of intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) between the U.S. and partner jurisdictions, automatic third-party account reporting began this year, making it less likely that offshore financial accounts will go unnoticed by the IRS.

Also, the Department of Justice’s Swiss Bank Program is another way in which the U.S. will obtain a significant amount of information regarding U.S. taxpayers with Swiss bank accounts:

In addition to FATCA and reporting through IGAs, the Department of Justice’s Swiss Bank Program continues to reach non-prosecution agreements with Swiss financial institutions that facilitated past non-compliance. As part of these agreements, banks provide information on potential non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers. Potential civil penalties increase substantially if U.S. taxpayers associated with participating banks wait to apply to OVDP to resolve their tax obligations.

The overwhelming success of the IRS voluntary disclosure initiatives (both OVDP and the streamlined program) is unquestionably attributable to the U.S. government’s use of a traditional “carrot and stick” approach. With OVDP and the streamlined program representing the “carrot” used to entice non-compliant taxpayers to take action and return to tax compliance, a robust enforcement agenda carried out by the IRS, working hand-in-hand with the Justice Department, represents the “stick.” Enforcement actions in this area consist of both criminal and civil proceedings. The DOJ’s Offshore Compliance Initiative proclaims that “[o]ne of the Tax Division’s top litigation priorities is combatting the serious problem of non-compliance with our tax laws by U.S. taxpayers using secret offshore bank accounts” and maintains an updated list of offshore criminal prosecutions on its website. Today’s IRS announcement reveals that the IRS has conducted thousands of civil audits in this area:

Separately, based on information obtained from investigations and under the terms of settlements with foreign financial institutions, the IRS has conducted thousands of offshore-related civil audits that have produced tens of millions of dollars. The IRS has also pursued criminal charges leading to billions of dollars in criminal fines and restitutions.

Finally, while acknowledging the reality that the Internal Revenue Service has faced years of budget cuts and deep declines in its workforce (both civil revenue agents and criminal special agents), today’s announcement warns that the agency remains vigilant and aggressive even while resource-constrained:

The IRS remains committed to stopping offshore tax evasion wherever it occurs. Even though the IRS has faced several years of budget reductions, the agency continues to pursue cases in all parts of the world.

U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed offshore accounts or assets should well heed today’s warning from the IRS. With the implementation of tax exchange mechanisms such as FATCA, and other enforcement initiatives like the Swiss Bank Program, the IRS has access now to far more information about the offshore activities of U.S. taxpayers than ever before. And non-compliant taxpayers who fail to take voluntary, corrective action now will surely face harsh consequences when they are invariably discovered by the IRS or other tax authorities.

Matthew D. Lee is the author of The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act Answer Book 2015 (published by the Practising Law Institute), a definitive treatment of the due diligence, withholding, reporting, and compliance obligations imposed by FATCA on foreign financial institutions, non-financial foreign entities, and withholding agents.  For more information on this publication, please click here. 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Criminal Tax, FATCA, FBAR, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, IGA, Intergovernmental Agreement, IRS Audits, IRS Criminal Investigation Division, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI), Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, Swiss Bank Program, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division | Tagged DOJ, FATCA, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, foreign bank, intergovernmental agreement, Internal Revenue Service, irs criminal investigation, Justice Department, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, Swiss Bank Program, voluntary disclosure | 1 Reply

Internal Revenue Service Begins Reciprocal Automatic Exchange of Tax Information Under FATCA IGAs

Posted on October 3, 2015 by Matthew D. Lee
Reply

On October 2, 2015, the Internal Revenue Service announced that it had achieved a key milestone in implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a critical anti-tax evasion law passed by Congress in 2010 but not fully implemented until July 2014. The milestone announced by the IRS was the exchange of financial account information with certain foreign tax administrations by September 30, 2015. To achieve the reciprocal exchange of tax information by the September 30 deadline, the IRS successfully and timely developed the information system infrastructure, procedures, and data use and confidentiality safeguards to protect taxpayer data while facilitating reciprocal automatic exchange of tax information with certain foreign jurisdiction tax administrators as specified under the intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) implementing FATCA.

“Meeting the Sept. 30 deadline is a major milestone in IRS efforts to combat offshore tax evasion through FATCA and the intergovernmental agreements,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. “FATCA is an important tool against offshore tax evasion, and this is a significant step in the process. The IRS appreciates the assistance of our counterparts in other jurisdictions who have helped to make this possible.”

The reciprocal, automatic exchange of information with certain partner jurisdictions is part of the IRS’s overall efforts to implement FATCA, enacted in 2010 by Congress to target non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers using foreign accounts or foreign entities. FATCA generally requires withholding agents to withhold on certain payments made to foreign financial institutions (FFIs) unless such FFIs agree to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U.S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest.

In response to the enactment of FATCA and other jurisdictions’ interest in facilitating and participating in the exchange of financial account information, the U.S. government entered into a number of bilateral IGAs that set the groundwork for cooperation between the jurisdictions in this area. Certain IGAs not only enable the IRS to receive this information from FFIs, but enable more efficient exchange by allowing a foreign partner to gather the specified information and provide it to the IRS. And some IGAs also require the IRS to reciprocally exchange certain information about accounts maintained by residents of foreign jurisdictions in U.S. financial institutions with their jurisdictions’ tax authorities. Under these reciprocal IGAs, the first exchange had to take place by September 30, giving the IRS a deadline to put in place a process to facilitate this data exchange.

The IRS announcement further stated that the information now available provides the United States and partner jurisdictions an improved means of verifying the tax compliance of taxpayers using offshore banking and investment facilities, and improves detection of those who may attempt to evade reporting the existence of offshore accounts and the income attributable to those accounts.

The IRS will only engage in reciprocal exchange with foreign jurisdictions that, among other requirements, meet the IRS’s stringent safeguard, privacy, and technical standards. Before exchanging with a particular jurisdiction, the United States conducted detailed reviews of that jurisdiction’s laws and infrastructure concerning the use and protection of taxpayer data, cyber-security capabilities, as well as security practices and procedures.

“This groundbreaking effort has fundamentally altered our relationship with tax authorities around the world, giving us all a much stronger hand in fighting illegal tax avoidance and leveling the playing field,” Koskinen said.

The IRS announcement further stated that meeting this deadline reflects a significant international collaboration and partnership with dozens of jurisdictions around the world. The capacity for reciprocal automatic exchange builds on numerous accomplishments including the following:

  • Development of a consistent data reporting format, or schema, and the agreement to use this format by all jurisdictions;
  • Establishment of the details and procedures required to assure data confidentiality;
  • Creation of a data transmission system to meet high standards for encryption and security; and
  • Cooperation with foreign jurisdiction tax administrations to achieve the timely implementation of this exchange.

The IRS announcement declined to identify which countries received tax information from the IRS, but The Wall Street Journal reported that a total of 34 countries are eligible to receive tax information from the U.S. That list includes the following countries:

Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

The type of information typically exchanged pursuant to the FATCA IGAs consists of the name of the account holder, address, account number, account balance, and amount of dividend and interest payments, among other items. This disclosure applies to accounts above a certain threshold.

The conclusion of the IRS announcement contained another warning to non-compliant taxpayers of the increasing risks of detection:

Koskinen noted the risks of hiding money offshore are growing and the potential rewards are shrinking.

Since 2009, tens of thousands of individuals have come forward voluntarily to disclose their foreign financial accounts, taking advantage of special opportunities to comply with the U.S. tax system and resolve their tax obligations. At the beginning of 2012, the IRS reopened the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), which is open until otherwise announced.

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Criminal Tax, Department of the Treasury, FATCA, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, IGA, Intergovernmental Agreement, Internal Revenue Service, IRS Criminal Investigation Division, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI), Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, Treaties | Tagged FATCA, Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, IRS, irs criminal investigation, Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, tax evasion | Leave a reply

Our Tax Controversy Practice

Helping clients navigate sophisticated tax issues for more than 60 years... Read More Here

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 117 other followers

Authors

Stephanie C. Chomentowski
Jed Silversmith
David Kuchinos
Jill E. Misener
David J. Moise
Madeline Obler-Grill
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

ADD TO YOUR FEED

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

RECENT POSTS

  • Significant Changes to Partnership Tax Audits Coming in 2018
  • IRS Criminal Investigation Division Announces New Priorities
  • Tax Court Holds IRC Charitable Contribution Subsection is not Self-Executing in the Absence of Regs
  • IRS Announces Plans to Move Forward with Passport Revocation Program
  • Pennsylvania Announces 2017 Tax Amnesty Details

Categories

  • Anti-money laundering
  • Attorney-client privilege
  • Bank Secrecy Act
  • Civil forfeiture
  • Civil Tax
  • Crime-fraud exception
  • Criminal forfeiture
  • Criminal Tax
  • Department of the Treasury
  • District Court Litigation
  • FATCA
  • FBAR
  • Fifth Amendment
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
  • Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
  • Foreign Earned Income Exclusion
  • Form 8300
  • Form 8938
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Geographic Targeting Order
  • GTO
  • IGA
  • Intergovernmental Agreement
  • Internal Revenue Code
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • IRS Appeals
  • IRS Audits
  • IRS Budget
  • IRS Criminal Investigation Division
  • IRS Examination Division
  • IRS LB&I
  • John Doe Summons
  • Money laundering
  • National Taxpayer Advocate
  • Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI)
  • Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP)
  • Panama Papers
  • Required Records Doctrine
  • Responsible officer penalty
  • Sentencing
  • Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
  • Swiss Bank Program
  • Taxpayer Advocate Service
  • TIGTA
  • Treaties
  • Trust fund taxes
  • U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division
  • United States Tax Court
  • Whistleblowers
  • Work product doctrine

Blogroll

  • Bankruptcy Law Watch
  • Securities News Watch
  • TaxProf Blog
  • Sentencing Law and Policy
  • Procedurally Taxing
  • Federal Tax Crimes
  • Federal Tax Procedure
  • The Taishoff Law Firm

Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement

© 2021 BLANK ROME LLP. All rights reserved. Please contact Blank Rome for permission to reprint. Notice: The purpose of this update is to identify select developments that may be of interest to readers. The information contained herein is abridged and summarized from various sources, the accuracy and completeness of which cannot be assured. This update should not be construed as legal advice or opinion, and is not substitute for the advice of counsel.

Blog at WordPress.com.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: